Volume III, Number 8
August, 2002

Cover
Front Page (this issue)

News

Living

Editorial

Archives

Contact us


Columns
Crank Andy
Jittery Jeff

Things Which Don't Suck

Crappy's Bowl o' Flushing


Survivor crap
Spoilers
Recaps

Survivometer 5

Surviwhore!

Humor


 

 

Hide the kids, lock up the dog, and plaster the walls with garbage bags, it's...

By Crappy the Smart-Assed Toilet
True Dork Times Mascot and Craven Attempt to Appeal to the Lowest Common Denominator


This month, Crappy takes the time to field questions on his most favorite of flushable topics, the baseball strike:
Question: Crappy Sez:
Why are baseball players planning to go on strike? Because they're greedy. And because the owners would cut their salaries if they don't. Which also equals "greedy."
Wait a second, aren't the owners partially at fault? No, of course not. See, the owners keep complaining about how expensive player salaries are. Then they'll turn around and double a player's salary, if that's what it takes to screw another owner. Then they scream even more loudly that they're going broke, gut the team, and sell it at a 100% profit over what the paid for it three years earlier. Things would be much more peaceful if they could just dispense with these piddling things, like games and players, while they're waiting for their investments to mature.
If Bud Selig, Don Fehr and George Steinbrenner were locked in a room for a month, who would come out the winner? As long as you didn't give them any food: the fans.
Is baseball fixed? No. Except for: the players, who are almost all on steroids; the owners' financial statements; Bob Nightengale; and the inability of the Cubs, White Sox and Red Sox to win the World Series.
Doesn't anyone remember 1994? Apparently not. Don't worry, to win back the fans in 2003, they'll look the other way on steroids, and allow stars like Bonds and Sosa to hit off of tees, resulting in an exciting race to 162 homers in a season.
What does 'contraction' mean? With so many teams now, the owners can't command the same prices when they try to sell. A mere 50% gain over three years is just not worth the hassle. Supply and demand therefore dictates that some of the teams have to go.
So I'm assuming the players are pissed off about that, too? Well, yeah, since the owners are attempting to lay off 6% of the workforce to boost their own profits. Of course, if the owners have more money, they'll inevitably blow at least some of it on overpriced free agents. So the only people with the real beef here are the fans and the mid- to lower-level team and stadium employees. But they don't have a union, so they're screwed.

Back to the True Dork Times