Michaela's exit right before the merge was shocking, especially since she'd received extensive narrative investment in her reasons for playing, and her (previously) successful attempts to overcome in-game adversity. To be fair, the halo had started to slip a bit, particularly when she was shown yelling at Hannah mid-challenge in the last episode. But since Probst does that all the time, this was not exactly the most egregiously negative edit. We'll dig deeper into the move in a bit.
Before that, we should take a moment to appreciate the uniqueness of that Tribal Council. Michaela interrupted Probst's vote reveal to yell and glare at Jay (and Will)! That just doesn't happen. And Jay responded, as calmly as can be expected, owning the move in the moment. Meanwhile everyone else was making faces of dismay. Not only that, but she turned her back on her own snuffing. And then she hit a tree on the way out. Importantly, all of this seemed completely organic, Michaela was just visibly processing her emotions, not making a scene for the sake of drama. In an era where four-time players are becoming common, this kind of raw, unfiltered reaction has become increasingly rare. Bravo to all involved.
Was Jay's big move a good one?
As with all Big Moves™ in Survivor, this quickly divided fans into "stupid move" and "good move" camps, with the majority taking the former position. This is a pretty brave position to stake out, since 19 out of 20 of these people are going to not win. Having had a few more days to mull it over, we're inclined to go with an even braver position: The middle ground of "a decent move, but probably ultimately unsuccessful." The True Dork Times: Our hot takes are blazing.
The Pros: In a lot of ways, Andy Baker's assessment seems about right: Jay needed to make this move in order to win (whether or not he actually ends up doing so is a different question). He couldn't continue marching through the game with Michaela, making the same moves she did, because she was clearly a star in challenges, was thinking far ahead into the game, and everyone seemed to like her. That would be like hitching your wagon to J.T. in Tocantins and just hoping everyone votes for you at the end. Furthermore, as Rob Cesternino and Kass McQuillen discussed on the RHAP voicemails this week, unhitching that wagon right at the end and hoping to jump off for an easy victory--by voting Michaela out at final five or six-- was also destined to fail, because Michaela stood a really good chance of winning immunity through to the end, if she was allowed to get deep into the game.
Michaela presented other threats as well: She knew Jay had an idol, and in a merge situation, there was absolutely no guarantee she'd keep that information to herself. Furthermore, as he hinted in a pre-Tribal confessional, he must have had some sense that she would not take his betrayal well, and if he could take her out before the jury, he could avoid a situation in which Michaela sets every juror reaching Ponderosa on an anti-Jay crusade. So in light of all these considerations, Jay needed to make this move, and this was perhaps his best opportunity to do so.
The Cons: Having said all that, this move holds a high probability of backfiring on Jay. Michaela was 100% committed (as far as he or the audience could tell) to having the Millennials decimate the Gen Xers post-merge, then battle it out amongst themselves after that. As someone who is himself a strong challenge performer, Jay was already a potential post-merge target, and a Pagonging of the Gen X tribe was probably his best bet to escape that. Given Hannah's reaction to being left out of this decision, that chance of that scenario playing out now seems particularly remote.
Being a tousled-haired young guy might have also provided Jay a bit of a post-merge shield, but this move also torpedoed that possibility. In taking out an original tribe member who had shown loyalty to him, Jay exposed himself as a cutthroat player, right when he needed to hide that. Going forward, he will probably never be trusted by Bret and Sunday again, instead, he'll be targeted. Had he just sat back and let Bret or Sunday leave, he could play himself off as a harmless, happy-go-lucky Taylor clone. Instead, he'll be at the top of everyone's threat lists.
What does the show's editing suggest we should think about this move? It absolutely buried Jay. In his discussion with Will, Jay is shown listing all the reasons not to make this move, but he went ahead and did it anyway. Michaela had been slowly built up as a flawed hero. Jay has now carved himself out a spot as an illogical villain. Which is a pity, because, again, it was arguably a good move, and Jay's aggressive gameplay has been a welcome surprise from an unlikely casting slot. He's not dead yet, but he's close.
A Michaela post-mortem
Last week, we considered several past contestants as potential closest comparable player to Michaela, eventually settling on Rupert (specifically, Pearl Islands Rupert). Given the fan reaction to her ouster, that comparison seems to have held. Compare and contrast Michaela's reaction to receiving a vote from Jay to that of Rupert's "WHO VOTED FOR ME?" interrogation of Fairplay. Michaela's loyalty was her ultimate downfall, and as with Rupert, that could be an asset for her if she plays again. Just please don't go building any subterranean beachfront shelters, Michaela.
All in all, Michaela was a solid player and an entertaining character. Her major flaw as a player, as she correctly identified pre-game, was saying exactly what was on her mind. This, coincidentally, was what made her so popular with the audience. If she can rein that in just a tad by keeping it in confessional, she could have the best of both worlds. Her other problem, of which her exit interviews suggest she's now perfectly aware, was that she trusted people she shouldn't. She also really bought into the idea that original tribes are supposed to stick together, which is clearly a dated concept strategically. This is also something that having seen herself on TV, she could easily correct if she returned. A Michaela playing in Season 35 or beyond could easily be seen as a mark by other returnees, hoping to prey on her loyalty, and if she wanted to, she could play that mis-read all the way to the end.
Before leaving our discussion of Ep. 7, one other tragic side-effect of Michaela's blindside is that Hannah finally had a solid episode. She took note of her potential peril within Ikabula's power structure, then deftly acted to undermine Bret's position in the tribe. Her gambit worked, too, as the Millennials agreed to split their votes, then pile their re-votes on Bret after a likely tie. But alas, all this was for naught when Jay decided to blindside Michaela instead.
What does the merge hold in store?
As was made clear in the preview for next week, the merge is now upon us. And it should be a good one. Despite this originally being a two-tribe season, it appears that the swap has succeeded in splitting apart feuding factions within those initial tribes, then exacerbating those divisions, stoking what should be an explosive final seven episodes. In every swapped tribe, the larger group from the initial tribe voted out one of their own, while the people from the smaller group survived, like three mini Jalapaos taking down mini Timbiras (in Tocantins). Putting all those contentious subgroups back together via the merge could lead to any number of new alignments and hostilities. Here, as best as we can figure it, are the core remaining alliances:
So there are three groups of three, two of whom have an idol, plus a Millennial straggler (Will), a group of two Gen X-ers, no idol, and David (plus idol). There are so many different combinations possible here, it's really difficult to process.
Of the various groups, the Gen X people seem the most likely to be willing to work with each other, at least temporarily, for the mutual benefit of all involved. Ostensibly, they're down 7-6 in numbers to the Millennials, but that's only if the Millennials all vote together, which seems unlikely. Even so, odds are that Ken will chafe at any hint of leadership by Chris (or Bret, or David), and everything could fall apart fairly quickly. With Ken and Jessica having weak ties to Adam and to Taylor, they could also flip one of the Millennial sub-alliances (as could David). And that's assuming Ken and Jessica even continue voting together. This could potentially rival the Philippines merge in its utter chaos.
Okay, fine. Who's in the most danger?
Perhaps more simple than predicting who will vote together is who be voted against. There are several strong players left, and few of them should have any interest in facing the jury next to each other. (Although we really wish someone would try that in a non-returnee season.) So chances are, there will be a lot of jostling for power in the short term. Who is in the most immediate peril? Here's a short list:
Or, obviously, it could be none of these people, because we know nothing.
----
Okay, that's enough of that. On to the vidcaps!
Millennials vs. Gen X Episode 7 recaps and commentary
Exit interviews: Michaela Bradshaw
Episode 7 Podcasts
ADVERTISEMENT