Vol. V, No. 2
April, 2004
TDT cover
This issue


24 Crap
Life Expectancy
You Got Jacked



Old crap
TDT Archives

Old Survivor crap
S7 spoilers
S7 recaps



Contact us

mb_vs__mbBurnett vs. Burnett
Who would win in a fight between 'Survivor' and 'The Apprentice'?


By Rhea L.T. Suchs
True Dork Times Dramality Editor
HOLLYWOOD, California (TDT) Four years into America's seemingly incurable addiction to reality TV, the viewing public is still flocking in inexpicable numbers to Mark Burnett over-produced fare (such as the top ten-squatting shows Survivor: All-Stars and The Apprentice) like moths to the bug zapper. At least if you ignore such offerings as The Restaurant and Boarding House: North Shore, as did most of America. But still, Burnett apparently has enough clout to stick the peacock network with a multimillion-dollar oversight fee for The Contender, so somebody must think this stuff is gold. These may be the same people who see fit to keep tossing money Rob Schneider's way, it's hard to tell, what with the lack of financing-disclosure laws and all. Nonetheless, this begs the question: if you were forced, say by terrorists, or something, to watch just one of these soaps-that-we-swear-aren't-scripted, which should it be? Well, luckily for you, we can help you with that. We put the shows through their paces, and picked winners in various categories of watchability. Read on.

Category Survivor The Apprentice The edge goes to...
Concept You know the drill: 16 (or 18) contestants, allegedly strangers, stranded, with only handouts from the show upon which to survive for 39 days. Contestants voted out by their peers, allegedly without producer interference, which was originally interesting from a social dynamics perspective. Alliances and booting-the-strong make the late stages increasingly tedious with each passing season. In a dramatic departure, 16 contestants, initially separated into two tribes, er, "corporations." Donald Trump boots, er, "fires" people each week, following his (and Mark Burnett's) whims. Unlike Survivor, success actually gets rewarded here, though. Somewhat, anyway. Contestants actually put through tests of both social and business acumen, too.

Tie. Originally interesting, Survivor's format gets muddled a bit each time, but the core routine is rapidly showing its age. The Apprentice just works, and the limits and dynamics of inter-contestant strategy on the show have only just begun to be tested.

Contestants marianoDim enough to be amusing as they strategize, yet highly-strung and self-important enough to provide campsite fireworks on cue. You can't not watch them, not unlike a train wreck. kwameSmarter, but significantly less colorful than the Survivor casts. In fact, many are outright dull. On the other hand, would you let Robb Zbacnik or Big Tom Buchanan run a piece of your empire? We think not. Slight edge to Survivor casts, purely on entertainment value.
 
Challenges If you've seen one season, you've seen them all. Obstacle courses, fire building, swimming and diving, puzzles, trivia, or combinations thereof. Editing required to make them seem close. The repetition dulls your senses. Business-related activities from real life. And since the salesmanship requires interaction with non-TV people, Far and away, The Apprentice. Although it could slip after multiple seasons.
Unscripted "drama" As in, all the stuff that happens away from challenges and tribal councils. Lack of food and sleep makes Type A people irritable, which leads to viewing "pleasure." Repeat every six months. Although "romance" subplots are more painful to watch than those kids acting and singing on Barney. Here, since the cast lives a relatively pampered life, there's not much to stir the non-challenge, non-board room pot, apart from the casting ringers (Sam, Omarosa) thrown in for dramatic effect. Worse yet, this fills almost half the show. Painful, dull, and even lamer than The Real World. We really don't care one bit about Nick and Amy, sorry. Solidly Survivor.
 
Hosts, non-contestants probstHere, you're stuck with a choice between Jeff Probst and nature footage. The animals are usually more interesting. trumpComing into this, you'd think: Donald Trump? For an hour? But he's used sparingly, and used well. Even his business cliches seem fresh, at least when paired with contestants violating them. Trump's lieutenants also provide occasional wit and insight. Hands down, The Apprentice. Probst, you're fired.
Plausibility As artificial and unrelated to real survival (especially when those with actual skills are rapidly dispatched) as humanly possible. Gilligan's Island has more survival content. Clearly staged (you never see the cast saying "I'm from this show with Donald Trump and..." in their sales pitches), but far more believable as a test of corporate worth. Once again, no contest, The Apprentice.
 
Security *Yawn* For all its threats of multi-million dollar lawsuits, Survivor is more spoiled than a child growing up in the Bush family. Just check out Survivornews.net each week to learn the bootee before the show airs. Same threats from the same production staff. Not surprisingly, similar number of leaks, at least if you know where to look. Just check out ApprenticeNews.net each week to learn the firee before the show airs. Tie. Two equally leaky vessels.
Overall
And the winner, by a (the) hair, is... The Apprentice. Trump's commanding presence makes Burnett's heavy-handed over-editing perilously close to tolerable. Who would have guessed this was possible?
Back to the True Dork Times